All topics
 
member picmember pic
 
Snippets by author: A
 
Overall visits to all the topics: 5,067,466
Daily average (Calculated from the website subscription day): 2,078.534
Optional sorting commands:
Order by amount of visits: click here
Order by vote (attention: this may exclude from the returned results all the entries that have no votes): click here
Normal order: click here
Current order: by category: Methematics
Other categories available for this author (Limited data report: 100):
Advice: Martial Arts and Self Defense(4), Books(236), Boxing(2), Critical Reviews and Essays(4), Dictionaries(1), Emergency Care(4), Epistles Letters and Advice(5), Fantasy Epics and Fables(1), History and Documents(5), Humor and Jokes(2), Methematics(2), Music and Lyrics(6), News Digests and Press Reviews(1), Novels Poetry and Stories(3), Philosophy Reviews(7), Poetry(1), Programming(4), Programming Ajax(2), Programming Javascript(82), Programming Php(52), Psychology(1), Quotes(1), Religion Esoterica and Spirituality(13), Scientifical Reviews(4), Self Improvement(1), Sport Activities and Apparels(1), Tarots(1)
Showing topics: 1, 10
Available total: 450
This subscriber has a blog too: Read the blog. Shoutbox: 103 reviews: 153
 
Division The Math Of Gods: Ambiguities Of Antanairesis And New Math Operations Identification Number: 460 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Miniaturk_009.jpg Preview: 3*2   ***   ***     2*3   **   **   **     The two expressions are not really equivalent, though we may be used to deem them such: the former may mean we distribute 3 by 2 dimensions.   The latter we distribute 2 by 3 dimensions.     Division (related to the Greek antanairesis and its various spells) means once again to distribute a number N of items along as many Dimensions as number D prescribes:   N\D     The operation has the same intention of a multiplication, but is more ambiguous.     N/D   does that mean   (1) overall/items=dimensions to allocate   or   (2) overall/dimensions to allocate=items?     These operations are implicitly creating dimensions to allocate.   At this point, if you see the thing in this perspective, you can envision dozens of new mathematical operations (of which the "standard" division and multiplication are just one instance, I have no idea whatsoever why the one preferred), dep... read more: click here Visitors: 4,730 Tagged by its author as: Methematics This author also has a Blog Pythagoras: Why Triangles Matter? Right Triangle Conic Section Analytic Geometry Identification Number: 179 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Miniaturk_009.jpg Preview: Why Pythagoras seemed obsessed with triangles?   This is a question that I often asked myself, provided this basic premise: undoubtedly, Pythagoras had an intelligence that couldn't be lesser than ours; so it couldn't be that he devoted such great part of his life to the study of triangles only because he would have been engrossed by futile subjects that wouldn't have interested more mature minds.   Whatever we may think of men like him when the distance between we laymen and genius induces us into believeing we would have been smarter than them because we feel we would have been allegedly more "practical" than genius is, it would be preposterous presuming that what may appear obvious to our intelligence, couldn't be considered obvious by a man like Pythagoras as well, and that what may seem uninteresting to us, seemed interesting to him because of a limitation of his, limitations fr... read more: click here Visitors: 19,238 Tagged by its author as: Methematics This author also has a Blog